October 19, 2021

Will Communist Irina Bokova with her 2030 Agenda be the Next Secretary General of the United Nations?

IRINA BOKOVA 2Bulgarian communist Irina Georgieva Bokova, UNESCO head, is a favorite to become the United Nation’s new Secretary General in 2017. Georgieva Bokova was born on July 12, 1952.

On October 15, 2009, the General Conference elected Irina Bokova of Bulgaria as the tenth Director-General of United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Bokova is the first woman and first Eastern European to be appointed head of UNESCO. In addition to her native language, she speaks English, French, Spanish, and Russian. She is married and has two grown children who live and work in the United States.

Bokova served for two terms in the Bulgarian parliament under the Bulgarian Socialist Party. She was appointed in 1996 as minister of Foreign Affairs and served one year in that post in the cabinet of Prime Minister Zhan Videnov. Later, she served as Bulgaria’s ambassador to France and Monaco, Permanent Delegate of Bulgaria to UNESCO, and personal representative of the Bulgaria’s president to the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie from 2005 to 2009.

Irina Bokova is the daughter of the communist-era politician Georgi Bokov, editor-in-chief of Rabotnichesko Delo, the official newspaper and organ of the Bulgarian Communist Party. Bokova graduated from the Moscow State Institute of International Relations. She was a member of the Bulgarian communist party until 1990.

Bokova’s selection as head of UNESCO was criticized by many due to her past as a daughter of a member of the totalitarian communist elite. Bulgarian-born German writer Iliya Troyanov criticized Bokova’s selection as Director-General of UNESCO in the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, calling it “a scandal,” in light of the communist past of Bokova’s father as well as her own Communist Party affiliation. On the other hand, The New York Times, the voice of the Council of Foreign Relations (which is the invisible government of the United States), published an article supporting her nomination on the grounds that “She played an active role in Bulgaria’s political transformation from Soviet satellite to European Union member.” This, of course, is false!

In June 2014, the Bulgarian government nominated Irina Bokova to be the official candidate of the country for the Secretary General of the United Nations. Obama supported her since both of them share the same Marxist ideology and the same desire to create a planetary government where all nations would lose their constitutions, laws, courts, armies, and sovereignty. The UN bureaucrats would follow orders from the globalist elite who are members of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), the Bilderberg Group (BG), and the Trilateral Commission (TC). The powerful individuals belonging to this globalist elite would be the masters and the rest of the people of the world would be slaves.

Alex Newman, a respected foreign correspondent of New American magazine and a director of the anti-Communist organization Bear Witness Central in Sweden (this writer is South Florida director of Bear Witness Central), wrote an article titled “Bulgarian Communist Is Now Frontrunner to Lead UN” which was published in New American on May 15, 2015 and Bear Witness Central on August 29, 2015.  Newman explained that with the approval from the Obama administration, Bulgarian Communist Party operative Irina Bokova is reportedly the “frontrunner” to become the next secretary-general of the United Nations. This radical woman, “whose communist roots run deep, is being promoted to lead the United Nations by the Western globalist establishment and totalitarian Third World regimes — even though she has close ties with Russia”. The establist press is covering up her past and her communist views. However, Bokova’s candidacy should be very troubling to all supporters of freedom and liberty, Judeo-Christian values, national sovereignty, capitalism, and free market economy.

Newman pointed out that the newspaper Financial Times, a well-represented publication at the Bilderberg Group meetings, published an article stating that the Bulgarian communist is well suited for the job. It said the following: “She certainly ticks many of the right boxes: heavyweight UN experience, educated in Washington and Moscow, and a fluent French speaker to boot (without noting that her education in Moscow was at the mass-murdering Soviet regime’s State Institute of International Relations). She is said to be acceptable to the U.S. and has been nominated by her own government, one of the few in the region that maintains cordial relations with Russia. Sources say she also enjoys the support of Poland, now very much a regional leader.” The article further stated that: “The growing demands from emerging countries of the Global South for a UN that reflects twenty-first century realities adds a new factor to an already complex equation. The old order is dying but a new one has scarcely been conceived. Whoever ends up being tasked with responsibility for managing that change will need considerable skill to ensure that the UN is still capable of contributing to a peaceful, rules-based world order.”

This writer is extremely concerned about the socialist multi-polar New World Order that is “being conceived” by the dictators’ club that is the United Nations and by members of the globalist elite. This writer can only imagine what type of world order a communist Secretary-General of the United Nations would want to create.

Newman wrote that Irina Bokova’s current job, Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), was obtained with support from President Obama, which should also raise concerns. As stated earlier, Bokova’s selection to lead UNESCO drew widespread condemnation from survivors of communist Bulgarian gulags. German-Bulgarian analyst Iliya Troyanov wrote in the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung that “The new Director-General of UNESCO belongs to a small, powerful layer, which has ruined Bulgaria, and is only playing a game of democracy, as long as its privileges are not taken away.” Troyanov added that two gulag survivors from Bulgaria had declared Bokova’s election to be “shameful for us all.”

Alex Newman, an expert on the New World Order and the diabolical United Nations, said that “The scandal-plagued UNESCO organization, which is seeking to become the global education establishment and has developed a World Core Curriculum to indoctrinate all of humanity, was such a hot-bed of communists, criminals, dictators, Islamists, mass-murderers, and anti-American radicals that President Ronald Reagan withdrew U.S. membership in it. Bokova recently declared in an interview with state-run Russian media that “UNESCO was founded to promote the principles of humanism,” without noting that humanism is fundamentally incompatible with Christianity and that it is, in fact, a direct assault on it.

This writer has written many articles on how Barack Obama’s Common Core Curriculum Standards violates the First and Fourth amendments to our Constitution. The federal government cannot dictate to the 50 states any type of curriculum. However, this is especially true when socialist bureaucrats in the Department of Education in Washington and others in the testing business develop a curriculum without the involvement of a single teacher or university professor. Neither can the United Nation UNESCO bureaucrats implement a World Core Curriculum to indoctrinate the students of the world.

On July 1, 2015, the United Nations Human Rights Council passed a resolution in Geneva, Switzerland calling the nations of the world to “monitor” and “regulate” non-government education. The resolution requests that nations throughout the world, which mostly are run by oppressive dictators, start to eliminate educational freedom under the guise of human rights. The UN resolution approved by the Human Rights Council to control all forms of private education violates the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states in Article 26 that “parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to the children.” Why is Pope Francis failing to complain about this arbitrary totalitarian resolution in Geneva by the dictator-dominated Human Rights Council since, if implemented, would negatively affect Catholic-run schools worldwide?

Newman pointed out that Bokova (similar to Obama) is also what is known as a “red-diaper baby” — a child born to devoted communist parents. Estimates suggest that the brutal Bulgarian dictatorship assassinated somewhere between 100,000 and 250,000 people — dissidents, Christians, and others. The real numbers could be even higher. Political science Professor Emeritus R.J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii put the death toll by the Bulgarian communists at around 222,000. Many more were ruthlessly tortured and persecuted.

Newman wrote that in spite of those atrocities, Bokova was an enthusiastic youth member of the Bulgarian Communist Party, later becoming an adult member and even serving in various capacities within the brutal dictatorship. Bokova continued with the Comunist Party after it changed its name to the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP) following the apparent collapse of the communist terror regime. Newman said that, as New American writer and senior editor William F. Jasper explained, the name change of the Communist Party was primarily so “the communists could not only continue running Bulgaria as newly branded ‘socialists,’ but also benefit from the aid, loans, and investments being handed out by the United States and the European Union.” The communists are still in charge today in that Eastern European nation that has close ties with Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

Newman stated the following: “Bokova continues her involvement in the re-branded Communist Party, which is now part of the global tyranny-promoting Socialist International network. The alliance of communist and socialist political parties around the world regularly meets to demand global government, planetary socialism, and more. Recently, their annual Congress was hosted by the African National Congress-South African Communist Party regime, which has been linked by the world’s top expert on genocide to promoting the extermination of an entire nation. In fact, its leader regularly sings songs, in public and in front of his military, advocating genocide against the embattled Afrikaner minority.”

Newman pointed out that Rossen Vassilev, who served at the Bulgarian Mission to the United Nations in New York City from January 1980 until his defection to the West in July 1988, said that “Beneath Bokova unassuming exterior, she was a tough and loyal Communist apparatchik.” It was explained that Bokova’s stay in New York was cut short after the State Department rejected for nearly two years “the accreditation of her journalist-husband, Liubomir Kolarov, most likely because of his known association with Communist Bulgaria’s spy agency, the DS.”

Newman said “that those communists and criminals, most of whom were never punished for their crimes and murders after the alleged collapse of the Communist Eastern bloc, were the ones who nominated Bokova to lead UNESCO, and now, as secretary general of the United Nations. The New York Times has emerged as a top cheerleader for Bokova’s aspirations.”

Newman concluded his excellent article by stating the following: “The communist’s bid is being celebrated as an opportunity to give Third World autocrats a bigger voice in global government as humanity is prepared for what globalists refer to as their new, multi-polar world order. However, with the globalist establishment on both sides of the manufactured East vs. West divide cheering for Bokova to lead the UN, the scandalous effort may finally be enough to force the U.S. Congress to put its foot down. Americans should demand that the U.S. government completely withdraw from and defund the UN — and having an actual communist in charge might just serve as the catalyst to do that. For the sake of liberty, prosperity, and common sense, it is time for the UN to be relegated to ash heap of history.”

Alex Newman wrote an article called “UN and UNESCO Bosses to Join Communist Tyrants at Victory Day” which was published in New American on April 28, 2015.

Socialist United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon and UN Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Chief Irina Bokova, a long time Communist Party operative, appeared together in a meeting.

Newman explained that Ban Ki Moon and Irina Bokova celebrated “Victory Day” in Moscow, Russia with Vladimir Putin. Russia invited the brutal North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, and the presidents of the Eurasian Union regimes. An estimated 100 Communist Chinese troops and even a contingent of Indian forces as well as thousands of Russian soldiers participated in the festivities. Western leaders did not participate in the celebration, citing, among other concerns, events in Ukraine.

This writer believes that Ban Ki Moon and Irina Bokova did not care at all about the Russian invasion and annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula and the continuing military aggression of Russia in Eastern Ukraine. This writer thinks that it was shameful for the current Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki Moon and perhaps a future Secretary-General Irina Bokova to participate in Russia’s 70th anniversary Victory Day festivity in Red Square.

Newman pointed out that this year’s victory celebration, in what the Soviet regime called the “Great Patriotic War,” was the largest ever. It involved approximately 16,000 Russian troops, 200 armored military vehicles, and 150 military planes and helicopters, according to news reports. A number of Putin’s newest and most advanced military armaments were on display, covered in hammers and sickles, to show off the Russia’s growing, modernized, and better equipped military. A total of 26 or more presidents and dictators, mostly from former Soviet puppet states, attended.

Newman said that last year, Ban attended a G77 plus Communist China summit in Bolivia pushing for what more than 130 governments and dictatorships called a “New World Order to Live Well.” He stated the following: “Applauding the assembled rulers and their demands — global socialism, essentially — the UN chief declared: All countries need to act on these priorities, individually and collectively. That is how he understood the New World Order, he told the summit. Putin and Beijing, close allies, have both long been promoting what they call a multi-polar New World Order.”

Newman explained that the victory of the brutal Soviet Union regime and its Western allies over Nazi Germany allowed Soviet bloody tyrant Joseph Stalin, one of the most savage dictators in human history, to enslave the peoples of Eastern Europe. President Franklin Roosevelt approved at Yalta the abandoning of the nations of Eastern Europe to the tyranny of the Soviet Union. The role of the USSR in defeating the Nazis was due in large part to massive U.S. military aid provided to the bloody dictator Joseph Stalin. Newman wrote that “The fruits of that alleged foreign policy blunder, of course, included millions more innocents murdered and enslaved, along with the eventual emergence of the Cold War.”

Alex Newman ended his article by stating the following: “With U.S.-funded UN leaders brazenly consorting with some of the world’s most brutal communist tyrants in Putin’s communist-themed Victory Day celebration, Americans have yet another reason, as if more were needed, to demand a full U.S. government withdrawal from the dictator-dominated global organization. Under the Reagan administration, the U.S. has already withdrawn from UNESCO once over its anti-American extremism. Now, Obama’s Education Secretary calls it a global partner of the administration in its cradle-to-career education reform machinations. It is past time to pull out of UNESCO and the entire planetary outfit once and for all.”

The 2030 Agenda of the United Nations and its implications to the world

cover071015The United Nations is going to launch “The 2030 Agenda” at a major conference that will be held from September 25 to September 27, 2015 in New York City with the participation Marxist Pope Francis. The Marxist Pope Francis will be traveling to New York to deliver an address which will kick off this conference since he is a supporter of the socialist multi-polar planetary one world government that is being pushed by the New World Order. On July 8, 2015, Bolivia’s Marxist Evo Morales gave Pope Francis a cross with a hammer a repugnant cross, but he did not. This sacrilegious cross was designed by Father Luis Espinal, a communist Jesuit, who was assassinated in 1980 in Bolivia for conspiring with communists to overthrow the government of that nation. When he returned to Rome, Pope Francis called the repugnant sacrilegious cross “an art of protest” and not a communist symbol of the Marxist Liberation Theology of the Catholic Church. The Pope also accepted and thanked Bolivia’s Marxist Evo Morales for giving him the Order of the Condor and the Order of Luis Espinal, both of them decorated with a hammer and sickle.

Michael Snyder wrote an article titled “In September 2015, Agenda 21 will be transformed into the 2030 Agenda” on August 14, 2015 which was published in the website Bear Witness Central. Snyder explained that the United Nations is going to launch “The 2030 Agenda” at a major conference that will be held from September 25 to September 27, 2015 in New York City. Pope Francis will be traveling to New York to deliver an address which will kick off this conference. (This writer has written several articles pointing out that the Argentinian pope is not only a Marxist but also an advocate of the New World Order planetary government pushed by the globalists and the United Nations’ bureaucrats.)

Snyder pointed out the following: “Unlike Agenda 21, which primarily focused on the environment, the 2030 Agenda is truly a template for governing the entire planet. In addition to addressing climate change, it also sets ambitious goals for areas such as economics, health, energy, education, agriculture, gender equality and a whole host of other issues. As you will see below, this global initiative is being billed as a new universal Agenda for humanity. If you are anything like me, alarm bells are going off in your head right about now. This new agenda is solidly rooted in a document known as Agenda 21 that was originally adopted by the United Nations back in 1992.”

This author has written many articles and chapters in books regarding the evil Agenda 21 and the United Nations´ horrible treaties and laws that Marxist President Obama wants the Senate to approve. These treaties would take away our wealth, Constitution, courts, laws, army, guns, internet, federal agencies, and national sovereignty. He has explained the diabolical plan of a planetary government under the United Nations but ruled by the globalist elite who are members of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), which is the invisible government of the United States, the Bilderberg Group (BG), and the Trilateral Commission (TC).

Agenda 21

The first Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Conference was held on June 13, 1992. At the conference, 178 governments voted to adopt the program called Agenda 21, a most ambitious global initiative, in an effort to fight climate change. Agenda 21 is the United Nations’ plan to take over private property and freedom and create a world government using phony science on global warming. All of the United Nations’ studies on global warming have been discredited since the scientists who prepared them falsified the data. If this plan is fully implemented, Americans would lose their sovereignty and independence, their wealth, and their land to the United Nations and a group of powerful globalist elites would enslave us all.

Even though Agenda 21 was never ratified by the United States Senate, many states and local zoning and planning boards are implementing some of the recommendations as they prepare norms for land use. In order to bypass the United States Senate, President Bill Clinton signed Executive Order Number 12852 to implement Agenda 21. Dick Morris and Eileen McGann in their book, Here Come the Black Helicopters!: UN Global Governance and the Loss of Freedom (2012), explained that Agenda 21 spells out how each of us must live in the New World Order as follows: “We need to leave rural areas, low density suburbs, and leafy small towns and aggregate in big cities and crowded urban areas.” The United Nations, by means of Agenda 21, threatens the sovereignty of the United States and attempts to control our food supply, financial institutions, land, oceans, and rivers, all using the threat to the environment.

The Rio+20 Conference

In June 2012, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton travelled to Rio de Janeiro, Brazil to attend the 20th anniversary of the original Rio Conference on global sustainability. This conference was known as Rio+20. Without the approval of Congress, Secretary Clinton, on behalf of President Barack Obama, committed the United States to give the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) $2 billion towards an eventual fund of $100 billion.

Our contribution would go to a Green Climate Fund, which is located in Switzerland. This institution was created by the United Nations Climate Conference in Durban, South Africa, in December 2011. The Green Climate Fund will be run by a 24-nation interim board. The money towards this United Nations agency would come from developed nations, such as the United States. It will then be distributed to Third World countries, many of which are led by dictators, to be used to fight climate change.

The United States would have no control as to where its money is spent. Much of U.S. foreign aid in the past was wasted. Instead of going to the poor people, this aid went to the pockets of Third World dictators. One can imagine what the bloody regime of the Castro brothers would do with a grant of millions of dollars given by the United States and other rich nations so that Cuba could fight climate change. How about poor anti-American Islamic terrorist regimes?

Achim Steiner, United Nations Under-Secretary General and United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Executive Director, stated the following at the Rio+20 Conference: “World leaders and governments have today agreed that a transition to a green economy, backed by strong social provisions, offers a key pathway towards a sustainable 21st century.” Dick Morris and Eileen McGann in their book, Here Come the Black Helicopters!: UN Global Governance and the Loss of Freedom (2012), described the statement by Steiner as a new form of global extortion and the first major step in “a global scheme to redistribute resources from the First World nations, whose industry and hard work has created them, to Third World dictators who can stash the money in Swiss bank accounts.” The plan is for developed nations, which do not include China or India, to have a major transfer of wealth using the environment as an excuse.

The United Nations General Assembly elected Steiner Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme in 2006 for a four-year term. His mandate has been extended twice and will end in June 2016.

United Nations’ Treaties

The United Nations and the dictators of the Third World cannot wait to steal the money of the United States. To add injury to insult, Third World dictators have insisted that when they receive U.S. money, they want to be immune from legal challenges and lawsuits or outside inspections. What they mean is to have a free hand to use U.S. money for personal gain. Unfortunately, the president of the United States does not only want to redistribute wealth inside his country but also redistribute it among Third World countries. Obama’s radical agenda is similar to the new United Nations Agenda 2030 Goal 10: Reduce inequality within and among countries.

President Obama would also like the Senate to sign many United Nations treaties, such as the Law of the Sea (LOST), that would put his country on the road to a world government. The LOST treaty, which was negotiated in the 1970s, would abruptly place two thirds of the oceans under the control of the United Nations. When this treaty was presented to President Ronald Reagan in 1982, he rejected it, as did Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher of Great Britain.

The treaty created another United Nations agency, the International Seabed Authority (ISA), with the purpose of transferring the wealth from developed nations to Third World countries. The ISA will have the right to impose taxes or collect royalties on offshore oil and gas wells that are more than 200 nautical miles from the coasts of the United States. If this treaty were to be approved by the United States Senate, over time, billions of dollars would be taken from U.S. multinational corporations that drill for oil and gas far away from our coasts to the United Nations, instead of going to the U.S. Treasury. Additionally, the United States will be forced to share its technology for free with the entire world.

The treaty would become a massive global welfare program to Third World nations and be handled by the often corrupt bureaucrats from the United Nations. Additionally, this treaty would endanger the national security of the United States since its money could go to enemy nations that would use it to attack it. Sadly, the Obama administration fully supports the Law of the Sea as did previous administrations.

The Second Amendment to our Constitution, the right to bear arms, is currently under assault by the Obama administration. Now Obama has a new ally in disarming our nation in the form of the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), which was recently approved by the United Nations. Secretary John Kerry signed the ATT but the Senate has not ratified it.

One of the largest impediments to the establishment of a U.N.´s socialist world government is the weapons that are in the hands of the American people. Obama is forcefully pushing for the Senate to ratify the ATT, which includes registering, banning, and eventually confiscating all guns by the United Nations. Should the Senate ever pass this diabolical treaty, it is over for freedom-loving patriots in the United States. Americans need to keep their weapons as their Founders intended in order to defend their liberty against domestic and foreign enemies.

The United Nations, as well as Iran, China, Russia, and most Arab nations, wants the U.N. International Telecommunication Union agency to take over the internet and restrict its usage and regulate its content. Dictators and tyrants, such as Fidel and Raúl Castro, want to control the flow of information to their people. The internet in the United States, even though it is not perfect, serves as a vehicle to disseminate information to its citizens that the established pro-Obama press does not cover. As explained earlier, the media in the United States is controlled by the CFR, the TC, and the BG. Americans read in newspapers and watch in television what these groups want them to know. Thank God for the internet!

The Obama administration would like to restrict the information that Americans obtain from the internet but, so far, the president has not issued an executive order or tried to pass a law to do just that. However, it is well known that the White House keeps an enemy list of reporters and others who criticize the president or members of his administration. These journalists, who have investigated the many scandals of the Obama administration, have been subjected to illegal and unconstitutional harassment and espionage. This writer has been one of the victims of the Obama administration. It is very unfortunate that the United States under the presidency of Barack Obama is becoming more and more like the society described by the novelist George Orwell in his book 1984.

The United Nations would also like to have supremacy over the U.S. courts and place this nation under the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice. President George W. Bush denounced the treaty and refused to sign it. President Obama and the globalists would like the Senate to approve it. If our Senate were to approve such a treaty Americans would lose their sovereignty.

The United Nations would like to have the ability to tax Americans without their approval to transfer wealth to Third World dictators. Perhaps United Nations officials and globalists should read United States history to find out how patriots fought for independence over the issue of taxation without representation.

The International Monetary Fund head Christine Lagarde would like to levy a tax on wealth worldwide.

The head of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) Christine Lagarde would like for her international organization to become the planetary Federal Reserve. President Obama would like the Senate to give extraordinary powers to the IMF to do just that. The IMF, the European Central Bank, and the European Commission forced the small island of Cyprus to levy a tax on wealth as an experiment. On March 19, 2013, a date that will live in infamy among Cypriots, its government was forced by the “Troika,” a triumvirate composed of a globalist banking elite from the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank, and the European Commission to confiscate bank deposits between 6.75% to 9.9%. Prior to that day Cypriots hurried to pull their money out of banks and ATMs before the government could finalize a plan to seize depositors’ funds to satisfy euro zone leaders. However, many of them lost thousands of euros and suffered immensely.

The IMF headquarters is in Washington, D.C. The IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said she would not mind moving it to Beijing, China.

Globalist in the European Union and elsewhere would like the United States to adopt a Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities. This Code would restrict this country´s ability to place satellites and other objects in space. Unbelievably, Obama has said he will not ask the Senate for approval and that he would simply follow the Code voluntarily. This represents, of course, another violation of our Constitution since this Code is a treaty.

The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) wants to accelerate international cooperation and implement regulations worldwide. In essence, UNEP would like to become a global Environmental Protection Agency. This action would also end the sovereignty of the United States and allow the United Nations to dictate this country what to do in regards to its industries and would impose hard regulations on its businesses and industries. Obama´s EPA is filled with socialists and radicals who are constantly harassing energy companies and blocking the development of energy resources in this nation.

The socialist and communist globalists and radical environmentalists at the United Nations have been working over the years to take away the sovereignty of the United States. As explained by Morris and McGann, the United Nations’ Commission on Global Governance published its final report, named Our Global Neighborhood, in 1995. This diabolical document recommends, among other things, the following:

  • Establishing an Economic Security Council to oversee worldwide economies.
  • Authorizing the United Nations and its agencies to impose global taxes.
  • Instituting a U.N. Army.
  • Terminating the power of the permanent members of the United Nations.
  • Creating an International Criminal Court.
  • Creating a new body of the United Nations for civil society by which advocates for the environment, population control, etc. can play a role in policy making.
  • Placing the authority for regulating the production and distribution of arms on the United Nations as well as gun control.
  • Granting mandatory jurisdiction in the International Court of Justice to all members.
  • Ceding jurisdiction over the global commons, such as oceans, space, and the environment, to the Trusteeship Council.

As indicated earlier, the extremely powerful members the Council of Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group, and Trilateral Commission, which are made up of billionaire and millionaire bankers, industrialists, members of the established media, CEOs of multinationals, and high government officials from all over the world, also want a world government that they believe they would control. This is why the United Nations is moving rapidly in that direction.

Maurice Strong was involved in the Stockholm conference in 1971 that led to the establishment of the United Nations Environment Programme the following year. Strong organized the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, known as the Earth Summit that was held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil in June 1992. Maurice Strong, David Rockefeller, and other powerful individuals became members of the Club of Rome.

Maurice Strong

The criminal Maurice Strong is a socialist who served as Undersecretary General of the United Nations. He is the so-called godfather of the environmental movement. Strong lives in Beijing, China, where he teaches at Chinese universities and advices the totalitarian Chinese regime.

In 2005, Strong became involved in the investigation of the Oil-for-Food scandal of the United Nations. It was discovered that Strong, while working for the Secretary-General of the United Nations Kofi Annan, had endorsed a check to himself for $988,885. Although he was not indicted, he resigned to his U.N. post. He then moved to Beijing, China, where he teaches at Chinese universities and advices the Chinese government. Should Maurice Strong and his socialist and communist friends at the United Nations and throughout the world be trusted?

In his illustrative and alarming article, Snyder explained that the U.N.’s sustainable development program is being given an entirely new name, and the scope of its agenda is being broadened dramatically. The following is what the official United Nations website stated:

“The United Nations is now in the process of defining Sustainable Development Goals as part a new sustainable development agenda that must finish the job and leave no one behind. This agenda, to be launched at the Sustainable Development Summit in September 2015, is currently being discussed at the UN General Assembly, where Member States and civil society are making contributions to the agenda.”

Snyder said that the core document for the 2030 Agenda was finalized. The following comes from the preamble of this document:

This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It also seeks to strengthen universal peace in larger freedom. We recognize that eradicating poverty in all its forms and dimensions, including extreme poverty, is the greatest global challenge and an indispensable requirement for sustainable development.

All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan. We are resolved to free the human race from the tyranny of poverty and want and to heal and secure our planet. We are determined to take the bold and transformative steps which are urgently needed to shift the world onto a sustainable and resilient path. As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind.

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals and 169 targets which we are announcing today demonstrate the scale and ambition of this new universal Agenda. They seek to build on the Millennium Development Goals and complete what these did not achieve. They seek to realize the human rights of all and to achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls. They are integrated and indivisible and balance the three dimensions of sustainable development: the economic, social and environmental.”

Snyder pointed out the 2030 Agenda is not just a plan to fight climate change; this is literally a blueprint for transforming global society.

The following are 17 specific goals:

Goal 1 End poverty in all its forms everywhere

Goal 2 End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture

Goal 3 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages

Goal 4 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all

Goal 5 Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls

Goal 6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all

Goal 7 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all

Goal 8 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all

Goal 9 Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation

Goal 10 Reduce inequality within and among countries

Goal 11 Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

Goal 12 Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

Goal 13 Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts

Goal 14 Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development

Goal 15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Goal 16 Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels

Goal 17 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development

Snyder expressed his approval of many of those goals. After all, who would not want to “end poverty” or “halt biodiversity loss”? He stated the following: “But as you read through that list, ask yourself what forms of human activity would be excluded from it…The globalists want to use sustainable development as an excuse to micromanage the lives of every man, woman and child on the entire globe. We are told that individual liberty and freedom are “dangerous because when everyone just runs around doing whatever they want it is bad for the planet. For example, one of the goals of the sustainable development crowd is to push the human population into giant “megacities” (China is building a megacity of over 200 million people) and to allow nature to recapture much of what has already been settled by humanity.”

Snyder wrote that an article written by Dave Hodges presented the following map, which comes from America 2050 as one example of what the globalists want to do. It shows how the United States may look like in a few decades if the globalists have their way.

Snyder concluded his article by stating the following: “And of course this is just the tip of the iceberg. Eventually, the globalists want to fundamentally transform virtually everything about our society. This includes our economy, our government, our entertainment, our social interactions, our families and even our religious beliefs. So don’t let all of the nice language fool you. This new universal Agenda is far, far more dangerous than Agenda 21 ever was, and it is a giant step forward into a one world system governed by bureaucratic control freaks.”


This writer thinks that it was shameful for the current Secretary-General of the United Nations Ban Ki Moon and perhaps the future Secretary-General Irina Bokova to participate in Russia’s 70th anniversary Victory Day festivity in Red Square. This writer believes that the Bulgarian communist woman should be disqualified from being considered as future secretary-general of the United Nations. Ban Ki Moon, should be denounced since the participation of both of them in the event gave the dictator Putin legitimacy and support for his continuing military aggression against a peaceful neighboring country.

Sadly, the United States, European Union, and Russia signed a treaty respecting the territory integrity of Ukraine when that nation was asked to return all of its nuclear weapons as well as many of its conventional weapons to Russia. Yet, Obama has not sold one bullet to Ukraine in spite of the fact that many in Congress have asked him repeatedly to provide military assistance to a nation that believed incorrectly that the United States would honor its treaties. Obama has completely failed in his request to Russian dictator Vladimir Putin to stop his military aggression, the worst against a European country since World War II. It is no surprise that the allies of the United States do not trust Barack Obama and, what is much worse; our enemies do not fear him. Obama has made the United States a superpower in complete retreat and has seriously endangered the security of this nation.

The most powerful world elite made up of financial and banking interests and their political allies want the United States to surrender its sovereignty, wealth, liberty, and Constitutional Republic in the name of a phony environmental manufactured threat. But now the globalist elite and their servants, the bureaucrats from the United Nations, have created 2030 Agenda, a diabolical plan for an all-encompassing planetary government. In addition to addressing climate change, this agenda also includes ambitious goals for other areas such as economics, health, energy, education, agriculture, gender equality, and others.

This perverse global initiative is being billed as a new universal Agenda for humanity. Some previous U.S. presidents, some globalists’ politicians from both parties, and now Barack Obama want to eventually move our country to the control of the United Nations by signing treaties that are against this country´s national interest. The future of the United States and its individual freedoms are in great danger! We must resist any and all attempts to take away our sovereignty and our liberty.

Goal 10, which is to reduce inequality within and among countries, is clearly a call to take the wealth of rich countries, such as the United States, and give it to the dictators of the world, such as the Castro brothers in Cuba, Putin in Russia, Jinping in China, and Islamic regimes, so that our national security would be enormously endangered. Additionally, it calls, as Obama constantly calls, for redistribution of wealth in the nation and the implementation of a socialist or communist regime. The other goals of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development will micromanage the lives of every man, woman, and child on the entire globe.

Americans must demand full U.S. government withdrawal from the United Nations, which is a dictator-dominated global organization backed by the globalist elite who want to enslave all. One should educate Americans and those in Congress, who are not part of the New World Order, so that they can fight arduously to stop the evil globalist elite who want to take freedom and liberty away and destroy the Constitutional Republic.

We must also pray to God that Irina Bokova does not become the new Secretary-General of the United Nations in 2017. Additionally, we need to pray that this evil globalist elite and their organizations do not succeed in enslaving us all!