July 31, 2021

Crimes And Scandals Of Clinton Campaign And Why Hillary And Obama Need To Be Indicted


Donna Brazile and Hillary Clinton

After being fired by CNN for providing Hillary Clinton questions in advance of the presidential debates, Donna Brazile was appointed Interim Chair of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to replace the scandal-ridden Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. The Democratic Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz from South Florida was forced to resign after WikiLeaks published almost 20,000 DNC e-mails. Some of the e-mails indicated that DNC top employees were discussing how to manipulate events to favor Hillary Clinton in obtaining the nomination of the Democratic Party in 2016. This was done in direct violation of the DNC charter which mandates this committee to remain neutral during the Democratic Party primaries.

The leaked DNC e-mails showed the DNC efforts to destroy the campaign of the Marxist Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont. After Americans found out how the DNC rigged the primaries to help Clinton, the DNC went into an unsuccessful damage control mode. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was once again exposed as a very corrupt woman who would do anything to be elected president. When Hillary Clinton received her party nomination on July 26, 2016, she was a tainted candidate.


Donna Brazile wrote Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House in November 2017.

In her 288-page book Hacks, the former Democratic National Committee Interim Chairwoman Donna Brazile accused the Democratic Party and the DNC of favoring Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders. Brazile criticized the Clinton campaign and accused it of being dismissive of her after she took over as DNC chair following the resignation of Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Brazile published an article in Politico on November 2, 2017. Her book and the article claimed that Clinton stole the nomination and then blew the election.

Brazile stated that she promised Senator Sanders that she would find out if the DNC rigged the system to give Clinton the presidential nomination of the party. Brazile wrote that she found out a signed August 2015 agreement between the Clinton campaign and the DNC that assured the party would be bailed out of debt by Clinton’s fundraising efforts. In turn, the Clinton campaign would assume control of the DNC, make staffing decisions at the DNC, and have input over its finances.

Former Bernie Sanders campaign officials complained about the actions taken by the DNC after the first excerpt of Brazile’s book was released. Senator Sanders’ supporters had long accused the DNC of favoring Clinton, who won 34 primaries and nearly four million more votes than Sanders. Jeff Weaver, former Sanders campaign manager, said he was worried about the future of the Democratic Party. Weaver stated the following: “The electoral history of the last seven or eight years is pretty abysmal, America’s oldest political party may go the way of the Federalist. It needs to reconnect with grass roots supporters.”

Brazile contemplated switching out Clinton for Vice President Joe Biden after the former Secretary of State fainted in September 2016. The Clinton campaign said it was just pneumonia.

Brazile’s book was criticized by Hillary Clinton’s supporters. During her press tour for the book, Brazile told ABC News that critics of her book could “go to hell.”

C. Mitchell Shaw wrote an article titled “Clinton Campaign Scandals” which was published in the December 4, 2017 New American issue. Shaw said that in the “past few weeks have shed much new light on political corruption, illegal practices, and unethical activities in both the Clinton campaign and the DNC, to such a degree that it is difficult to imagine either of them bouncing back unscathed.”

Shaw explained that when it was clear that the DNC e-mail scandal was not going to disappear, the DNC and Clinton campaign began blaming the leaked e-mails on Russia. WikiLeaks denied the accusation. Hillary Clinton and the DNC continued to claim that the e-mails were not leaked but that they had been hacked.

When the scandal did not go away, Hillary Clinton took it to the next level and said that Russia rigged the election to favor Donald Trump. During the third and final presidential debate, Hillary Clinton — while avoiding questions about the content of the e-mails — went so far as to call Donald Trump “Putin’s puppet,” said Shaw.

The Clinton campaign, the DNC, and the complicit Destroy Trump corrupt mainstream media repeated the Trump “Putin’s puppet” accusation again and again during the rest of the campaign. It is very difficult for Democrats to continue making this false accusation now that President Trump has authorized the sale of anti-tank missiles and other weapons to Ukraine over the strong objection of Putin. In contrast, Obama never sold a bullet to this nation.

Who killed Seth Rich?

Image result

Seth Rich, a 27-year-old computer-voting specialist at the DNC, was murdered on July 10, 2016 in Washington, D.C.

Some people believe that Rich leaked the e-mails of the DNC to WikiLeaks. Julian Assange, founder of WikiLeaks, hinted that Rich was the source of the hacked e-mails and offered a $20,000 reward for the apprehension of his killer(s). While many have called his murder a botched robbery, the police found Rich’s wallet, credit cards, and cellphone on his body.

Some people think Rich was assassinated by a hired killer as punishment for his alleged leaked e-mails. Others blame Russia, a charge rejected by that nation. The D.C. police department is still investigating. No one has been arrested in the assassination of this young man.

The dossier prepared by Christopher Steele in collaboration with Fusion GPS with the purpose of destroying candidate Donald J. Trump

Shaw wrote that just before President-elect Donald J. Trump was inaugurated, the liberal media published “an intelligence dossier containing unsubstantiated, salacious accusations that Trump was being controlled by the Kremlin as a form of blackmail and supported by the Kremlin to help in his race against Clinton.”

Image result for Nellie Ohr

Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie Ohr

Nellie Ohr, the wife of a Justice Department (DOJ) official, Bruce Ohr, was hired by Fusion GPS, the company that together with Christopher Steele, the former British spy, wrote the anti-Trump dossier containing salacious, unsubstantiated accusations against Donald Trump. Later, Bruce Ohr was demoted for concealing the work of his wife on the fake dossier.

FoxNews reported that the Fusion GPS connections with Nellie and Bruce Ohr have raised Republican concerns about the objectivity of the Justice Department and even prompted a call from President Donald Trump’s outside counsel for a separate special prosecutor. Mrs. Ohr was indeed involved in the Trump research. Bank records reveal that Fusion GPS contracted with her “to help our company with its research and analysis of Mr. Trump.”

Image result

Christopher Steele wrote, together with Fusion GPS, the unverified anti-Trump dossier.

FoxNews reported that Bruce Ohr met during the 2016 campaign with Christopher Steele, the former British spy, who authored the dossier. The FBI used the dossier, which was an unproven 35-page document, to investigate and possibly obtain surveillance warrants. Now Christopher Steele is faced with a libel lawsuit filed by a Russian and is changing his accusation of Donald Trump’s links with Russia to “possible” collusion.

FoxNews said that Fusion GPS “attracted scrutiny because Republican lawmakers have spent the better part of this year investigating whether the dossier, which was funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, served as the basis for the Justice Department and the FBI to obtain FISA surveillance last year on a Trump campaign adviser named Carter Page.”

FoxNews stated that President Donald Trump lawyer, Jay Sekulow, has asked for the appointment of a separate special prosecutor to look into potential conflicts of interest involving Justice Department and FBI officials. A group of House of Representatives Republicans have for months called for the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate certain Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton-related controversies. Attorney General Jeff Sessions is reviewing the request for a special counsel.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated the following: “I’ve put a senior attorney, with the resources he may need, to review cases in our office and make a recommendation to me … if things aren’t being pursued that need to be pursued, if cases may need more resources to complete in a proper manner, and to recommend to me if the standards for a special counsel are met.”

The dossier was fake and rapidly discredited. Moreover, it was later discovered that the dossier was paid by the Clinton campaign and the DNC and then shared with James Comey’s FBI. As previously stated, Nellie Ohr, the wife of a Justice Department official, Bruce Ohr, was hired by Fusion GPS, the company that wrote the unsubstantiated accusations against Donald Trump.

The Clinton campaign broke campaign finance laws by failing to disclose the payment of the anti-Trump dossier. This would be one of the many election laws broken by the corrupt Hillary Clinton and her campaign workers.

C. Mitchell Shaw wrote the following: “Clinton and the DNC were so dedicated to keeping their involvement in the creation of the dossier a secret that they described the payments to Fusion GPS as legal services paid to Marc Elias. This is a clear violation of campaign finance laws requiring campaigns and parties to show an accounting of what monies come in (and from whom) and what monies go out (and to whom and for what). The non-profit Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC) on October 25, 2017 claiming that the Clinton campaign and the DNC violated federal law when they undermined the vital public information role of campaign disclosures by filing misleading reports. If the FEC decides to investigate, this could be added to the list of new investigations on the Clinton campaign.”

C. Mitchell Shaw pointed out that Brazile wrote that she had made a promise to Bernie Sanders to “get to the bottom of whether Hillary Clinton’s team had rigged the nomination process, as a cache of emails stolen by Russian hackers and posted online had suggested.” Brazile was a willing participant in the corruption she is now exposing and it is also important to note that the most damning of her claims are well documented, said Shaw.

Lastly, Shaw explained that Brazile wrote in her Politico article that by the time she took over as Interim Chair of the DNC, the party was in deep financial trouble because of the poor leadership of Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz and the “neglect” of President Obama. On September 7, 2017, Brazile called Senator Sanders and told him that Hillary Clinton had stolen the Democratic Party nomination from him and that she was a “cancer” in the body of the DNC. President Donald Trump, who defeated Clinton a year ago, later pounced on Brazile’s account and stated on Twitter that he always thought he would square off against Sanders.

Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, appearing before Congress, declined to criticize the dossier's 35 pages of salacious and criminal charges against Donald Trump and his aides, but he said it remains largely unverified, according to a source familiar with ongoing congressional inquiries. (Associated Press/File)

FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe recently testified in a close hearing of the House of Representatives Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

McCabe announced he will retire from the FBI early in 2018. McCabe, whose wife received over $700,000 from Democrats when she ran unsuccessfully for a state senate seat in the Legislature of Virginia in 2005, said the FBI could not verify the accusation of the collusion of Trump campaign with Russia. Yet the fake dossier was used to receive court-approval for the wiretapping of members of the Trump campaign as well Donald Trump.


Dick Morris and Eileen McGann wrote Rogue Spooks: The Intelligence War on Donald Trump in August 2017.

During the campaign and after the election of Donald Trump, Deep State rogue intelligence agents began an attempted coup d’état—now in progress— with the goal to overthrow the presidency of Donald Trump and subvert the will of the electorate.

Amazon describes Rogue Spooks as follows:

“Donald Trump’s first 100 days in office were roiled by allegations of treasonous contacts between his campaign team and the Kremlin to rig the election. These outrageous charges first surfaced in the notorious Trump Dossier, an unverified document of suspect provenance, full of wild and salacious accusations.”

“This dossier—filled with little more than gossip, rumor, and innuendo—was compiled by Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative who teamed up with the FBI and anti-Trump partisans. Hillary Clinton supporters paid for Steele’s work.”

“When no news media would publish the unverified dossier, the ex-spook enlisted the help of a former UK ambassador to Russia, who arranged in turn for a former U.S. assistant secretary of state to get the document to Senator John McCain, in the hope that he would then bring it to FBI Director James Comey’s attention. McCain did just that.”

“Comey himself played a critical role in the dossier ultimately going public, giving a confidential summary to President Obama and congressional leaders. It was immediately leaked by rogue spooks in order to demean, destabilize, and destroy Donald Trump’s nascent presidency.”

“The dossier and this mythical intelligence are the basis for the phony claims about a Russia-Trump collusion to steal the election. No proof was found. No substantiation uncovered. Even Comey told Trump he was not under investigation for the Russian meddling charges. But that didn’t end the leaks or the allegations. Working in concert with liberal news outlets, these rogue spooks have formed a new Intel/Media complex that threatens our democracy. Rogue Spooks will reveal how it works.”

“Readers of Rogue Spooks, from bestselling authors Dick Morris and Eileen McGann, will be shocked to learn the truth about the false accusations against President Trump in the flawed dossier. They’ll be interested to know how leaks to the media fueled the phony scandal, and how intelligence agencies will try to use the newly appointed special prosecutor to oust President Trump. They will also learn what we can do—specifically—to stop them.”

The Deep State

The rank-and-file officials in the CIA, NSA, FBI, and other intelligence agencies are patriotic individuals. But some of the high ranking officials on the 17 intelligence agencies as well as the members of the globalist elite serving in the Council of Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission are part of the Deep State. These individuals such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, James Comey, Robert Mueller, George Soros, John Brennan, Eric Clapper, Democrats in Congress, and many others are engaged in an ongoing coup against our elected President Donald Trump as this cartoon clearly indicates.

President Donald Trump has been trying to drain with great difficulty the Washington, D.C. Swamp. The globalists never expected Donald Trump to win and defeat their chosen candidate Hillary Clinton. Even though the globalists Insiders in Wall Street gave tens of millions to Hillary Clinton and only two newspapers endorsed Donald Trump, he won.

President Trump ran an anti-globalist, nationalistic, America First campaign, yet he has named 40 globalists to his administration since they are too powerful to be completely ignored. However, the president is a patriot and has named the least amount of globalists to his administration of any previous presidents.

The Clinton campaign and Obama paid thugs to beat up Trump supporters and used agent provocateurs to damage candidate Trump

Moderator Chris Wallace questions Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump during the third presidential debate at UNLV in Las Vegas, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2016. (Mark Ralston/Pool via AP)

On October 19, 2016, Moderator Chris Wallace asked questions to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump during the third presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nevada.

On October 20, 2016, Steve Contorno wrote an article titled “Trump says Clinton and Obama paid people to cause violence at his rallies” that was published by the website Politifact. Contorno said that during the third and final presidential debate, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump accused Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama of paying people to incite violence at his rallies.

Trump stated the following: “If you look at what came out today on the clips. I was wondering what happened with my rally in Chicago and other rallies where we had such violence. She’s the one, and Obama, that caused the violence. They hired people, they paid them $1,500, and they’re on tape saying, be violent, cause fights, do bad things. When I saw what they did, which is a criminal act by the way, where they’re telling people to go out and start fist-fights and start violence. In particular in Chicago people were hurt, and people could’ve been killed in that riot. And that was now all on tape started by her.”

Contorno said that Donald Trump was talking about the video released that week by Project Veritas Action, a conservative group that went undercover to secretly record Democratic operatives discussing plans to cause trouble at Trump rallies and then blamed Trump’s supporters. Project Veritas is an organization founded by James O’Keefe, a 32-year-old conservative activist.

In 2009, O’Keefe posted undercover videos that showed illegal activities by employees of ACORN, the Marxist organization led by Barack Obama. These videos destroyed ACORN. Its communist leaders and employees then joined other radical organizations. Previous operations from Project Veritas have led to resignations of Democratic operatives and NPR executives.

Contorno wrote that a 16-minute video posted by James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas called “Rigging the Election,” dramatically begins with O’Keefe promising to expose “the dark background dealings of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign.” O’Keefe said the following: “What you’re about to see will make you uncomfortable and angry. It’s graphic, uncensored and disturbing. Our attorneys say there is strong evidence of criminality.” The video showed Scott Foval, who is the national field director at Americans United for Change. He was a subcontractor working for Democracy Partners, a consulting firm founded by Robert Creamer, who is also featured in the video. Democracy Partners worked for the Democratic National Committee.

Contorno wrote that the video showed Foval saying the following: “If you’re there and you’re protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked at Trump rallies. That’s what we want. The whole point of it is, we know Trump’s people will freak the (expletive) out, the security team will freak out, and his supporters will lose their (expletive). There’s a script. There’s a script of engagement. Sometimes the crazies bite, and the crazies don’t bite. The key is initiating the conflict by having leading conversations with people who are naturally psychotic. I mean honestly, it is not hard to get some of these (expletive) to pop off. It’s a matter of showing up, to want to get in the rally in a Planned Parenthood T-shirt. Or Trump is a Nazi. You can message to draw them out and message them to punch you.”

The outrageous comments were rejected by DNC Interim Chair Donna Brazile, who said they “do not in any way comport with our long-standing policies on organizing events, and those statements and sentiments do not represent the values that the Committee holds dear.” The scandal forced the dismissal of Foval by Americans for Change and Creamer leaving his work with the DNC and the Clinton campaign.

Another individual mentioned in the video, Contorno pointed out, was Zulema Rodriguez. She bragged that she “did the Chicago event where they shut down” during the Republican Convention. She was referring to the Trump March 11, 2016 Chicago rally that was cancelled due to a massive anti-Trump protest, whose participants clashed with Trump supporters, causing several injuries. Campaign finance reports showed that the Clinton campaign paid Rodriguez $1,610 in Arizona on February 29, 2016 — less than two weeks before the Chicago rally.

Contorno stated the following: “Other people and groups have been given credit for shutting down the Chicago rally. Multiple news reports suggest that University of Illinois Chicago students, MoveOn.org and Bernie Sanders supporters mobilized online to shut down the rally. Hundreds of anti-Trump protesters planted themselves inside the event with the goal of preventing it from even taking place. They succeeded, and clashed with Trump supporters after it was announced the Republican businessman wouldn’t be attending. FEC reports show Rodriguez also worked for MoveOn.org.”

Image result

Robert Creamer, a convicted felon, is a radical leftist political consultant and a great friend of Barack Obama.

Creamer is the husband of socialist Democratic congresswoman Jan Schakowsky from the Illinois’s 9th congressional district. Creamer’s firm, Democracy Partners, works with Democratic campaigns. He also leads the radical nonprofit group Americans United for Change.

In 2005, Creamer pleaded guilty to tax violations and $2.3 million in bank fraud in relation to paying checks with insufficient funds to fund his public interest group in the 1990s. He repaid the funds and was convicted and sentenced to five months in prison and eleven months of house arrest.

On October 19, 2016, Jen Lawrence wrote an article titled Robert Creamer Visited Obama’s White House 340 Times” that was published by Breitbart. Lawrence said that the Obama’s White House logs show Creamer making 340 visits to the White House, with 45 of those meetings including President Obama. Creamer’s political consulting firm Democracy Partners is at the center of the Project Veritas investigation exposing Democrat operatives instigating violence at Trump rallies and plotting potential voter fraud.

Jen Lawrence pointed out that in addition to Creamer Besides regular visits to the White House, “Creamer’s own statements contradict Brazile’s claim that Democracy Partners was just a bit player in the Clinton campaign and the DNC.” Lawrence explained the following: “In hidden camera video filmed at Creamer’s Washington, D.C. office, Creamer explains that Hillary Clinton is aware of all of his activities, directly or indirectly, and that Democracy Partners has a daily conference call with the Clinton campaign, as well as frequent calls with the White House. Creamer’s meetings at the White House include two meetings with President Obama in March 2011 and June 2013 where the total number of people is listed as just two.”

In the second O’Keefe video, Lawrence stated the following: “Scott Foval said that Bob Creamer is diabolical and I love him for it. While discussing the potential voter fraud plot, Foval credits Creamer for coming up with most of these ideas, and describes Democracy Partners as a dark hat. Creamer boasts having more than four decades as a political organizer and strategist on his Democracy Partners page. Creamer’s biography also details a long history working with the DNC at the presidential campaign level. During the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections he worked with the Democratic National Committee as a consultant to the Obama Presidential Campaign coordinating field based rapid response to Republican Presidential candidates. During his career, Creamer has worked on hundreds of electoral campaigns at the local, state and national level.”

On November 7, 2017, William Jasper wrote an article titled “Alt-Right and Agents Provocateurs” that was published in New American. Jasper wrote that due to the undercover camera work of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, the nation learned that top Democratic Party operatives were boasting about infiltrating Trump campaign rallies and events, staging conflicts, and “creating anarchy.” Jasper explained that “Scott Foval, Bob Creamer, and other dirty tricks agents for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee were caught in flagrante admitting to staging and instigating conflicts for maximum media effect.”

Jasper stated the following: “Foval made it clear that he knew that many of his tactics are illegal and that he didn’t care that some of the DNC’s legal experts were worried about possible prosecution, if discovered. It doesn’t matter what the frigging legal and ethics people say, we need to win this mother******,” he said, adding, We’re starting anarchy here. Did the same media go back and clobber Clinton and the DNC for the deception after the Foval revelations? Of course not; instead they went after O’Keefe and Project Veritas.”

Image result for saul alinsky pictures

Hillary Clinton wrote her dissertation in college on the communist Saul Alinsky. She was his friend and disciple. Obama considered Alinsky his spiritual guide.

Jasper pointed out that Bob Creamer, who was a mentor of Scott Foval, appeared on the video describing the anarchy he was orchestrating. Creamer and Foval were following the program advocated by the Marxist and Chicago-based community organizer Saul Alinsky, the author of Rules for Radicals and who was a close friend of Hillary Clinton.

Jasper explained that Sanford D. Horwitt wrote a biography of this Marxist agitator from Chicago and founder of the community organizers movement. Horwitt wrote in his book about a revealing incident dealing with Alinsky’s advice to students at Tulane University in 1972. The radical students were planning to protest a speech by George H. W. Bush, who was then the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Horwitt wrote the following: “The students told Alinsky they were thinking about picketing or disrupting Bush’s address. That’s the wrong approach, he rejoined, not very creative — and besides causing a disruption might get them thrown out of school. He told them, instead, to go to hear the speech dressed as members of the Ku Klux Klan, and whenever Bush said something in defense of the Vietnam War, they should cheer and wave placards reading, The KKK supports Bush. And that is what they did, with very successful, attention-getting results.” Those students acted as agent provocateurs, a tactic used by communists and others throughout the world.


Shirley Teeter was a paid agent provocateur by the Clinton campaign.

Teeter was used cynically and illegally to validate Hillary Clinton’s charge that Trump supporters were “a basket of deplorables.” Jasper discussed the role of agent provocateurs in the Clinton campaign as well as how these individuals are currently employed in the Anti-Trump Deep State and resistance movement. He cited as prime example Shirley Teeter, a woman agent provocateur used by the Clinton campaign to discredit Trump and his supporters.

Shirley Teeter, a 69-year-old woman who was wearing an oxygen mask and carrying an oxygen tank, claimed she was hit by a supporter of candidate Trump at a Trump rally in North Carolina. The corrupt Destroy Trump mainstream media featured photos of the handicapped woman on the ground with her wheelchair as a victim of despicable and inhumane Trump’s supporters. However, it turned out that Teeter was a paid agent provocateur. She “was one of our activists,” Scott Foval bragged on the video. He also said that she “had been trained up to birddog” and perform her stunt exactly as it was planned.

Agent provocateurs were present on the August 12, 2017 deadly confrontation in Charlottesville, Virginia, said Jasper. He explained that the violent confrontation between neo-Nazis/white nationalists on one side with masked Antifa thugs and Black Lives Matter radicals on the other culminated with the death of demonstrator Heather Heyer. The Deep State and the leaders of the resistance who are virulent Trump haters could not have asked for a better-staged event to reinforce their false narrative of President Trump as a reincarnated Hitler and a supporter of the Ku Klux Klan, said Jasper.

Jasper wrote the following: “The alt-Right, at least as represented in Charlottesville, provided the precise optics needed by the Fake News media not only to boost its relentless anti-Trump campaign, but also to associate legitimate concerns about illegal immigration with xenophobia, and efforts to retain Confederate symbols and Southern heritage with racism. They also served to boost the image of the communist-directed Antifa mobs as heroic opponents of fascism and bigotry… While some of the alt-Right celebrities are merely losers seeking fame by attaching themselves to Donald Trump’s coattails, others more closely fit the profile of agent provocateurs — that is, saboteurs whose purpose is to discredit from within.”

Image result

Jason Kessler is an agent provocateur who discredit conservatives, President Trump and his supporters by portraying them as racist pro-Nazi white nationalists.

Jasper mentioned another agent provocateur, Marxist Jason Kessler, who was a pro-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-radical environmentalist, pro-Obama, atheist, and who participated in the radical Occupy Wall Street movement and suddenly “converted” to a white nationalist and alt-right activist. He is known for being the main organizer of the white nationalist Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, which resulted in the death of Heather Heyer after a car was driven into the crowd.

Kessler celebrated her death by saying that the victim was “a fat, disgusting Communist” in a tweet that was linked to an article on the Daily Stormer, a neo-Nazi website. Kessler is a plant to advance the Marxist-globalist agenda and identify anti-communists as fascists.

Richard Spencer is a neo-Nazi 39-year-old agent provocateur who pretends to like Trump while saying he likes socialism and socialize medicine and government expending. He says “Heil Trump” with the intension to identify Trump with Hitler. Marxists are experts in using agent provocateurs to demonize and destroy their enemies.

Investigating the investigators


Hillary Clinton and Special Counsel Robert Muller are both part of the Swamp.

On October 23, 2017, Victor Davis Hanson wrote an article titled “Investigating the investigators” which was published in the website America Greatest. Hanson explained that as the President Donald Trump investigators—in Congress, in the Justice Department, and the legions in the media— are unable to charge the president with collusion with Russia, he raises the following two questions: “Was the zeal of the original accusers of felony behavior with the Russian collusion merely an attempt at deflection? Was it designed to protect themselves from being accused of serious crimes”?

Hanson raises the question: What did the FBI do?

Hanson stated the following:

“It was bad enough that the original narrative had the authors of the so-called Fusion GPS/Steele dossier leaking their smears to the media. Worse, the FBI, in the earlier fashion of the Clinton campaign, may have paid to obtain the Fusion concoction.”

“Now it appears that some of the leakers who had the file in their possession also may have belonged to the American intelligence community. Did the FBI pass around its purchased smears to other intelligence agencies and the Obama administration in the unspoken hope that, in seeing the file had been so sanctioned and widely read, some intelligence operative or one of the Obama people would wink and nod as they leaked it to the press”?

“And why did the progenitors of the Steele dossier fraud—the Fusion GPS consortium and former Wall Street Journal reporters (a firm that had a prior history of smearing political enemies with “opposition research”) and working indirectly on behalf of Russian interests—reportedly behind closed doors invoke the Fifth Amendment to avoid testifying about the dossier, its origins, and its funding before the House Intelligence Committee”?

“Increasingly, James Comey seems to be caught in contradictions of his own making. The former FBI director may well have misled the U.S. Congress in deliberate fashion, both about the timeline of events that led him to recommend not charging Hillary Clinton and about his denials that the FBI had communications about the bizarre “accidental” meeting on an Arizona tarmac between the U.S. Attorney General and Bill Clinton. How does an FBI Director get away with leaking his own notes, ostensibly FBI property, to the media with the expressed intent of leveraging the selection of a special prosecutor, only to succeed in having his friend, former FBI Director Robert Mueller, appointed to that very post—an official who presumably and earlier had been investigating possible Clinton collusion with Russian uranium interests”?

Image result

Imran Awan is a Pakistani-American information technology worker. He is currently awaiting trial on charges of bank fraud.

Awan worked as a shared employee for Democrats in the House of Representatives. At the time of his arrest in July 2017, he had been working as an information technologist in Congress for 13 years. He has been involved in multiple investigations in 2017. He is currently awaiting trial on charges of bank fraud. The Awan relationship with the corrupt former Democratic National Chairman Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz is a mystery.

So Many Questions, So Few Answers

Hansen raises several questions regarding the strange relationship between former Democratic National Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz and her IT “expert,” the now-indicted Imran Awan. Hansen asked the following: “Why would Wasserman-Schultz go out of her way to protect him and by extension his network from government investigations—even as Awan’s criminal familial enterprises, as well as his unauthorized and perhaps illegal conduct concerning government communications, were being exposed? Why is Awan apparently eager to talk to prosecutors about his relationships with Wasserman-Schultz and other congressional representatives? Why did an “in-the-know” Wasserman-Schultz apparently allow Awan to act so illegally for so long? In other words, the behavior of the former head of the DNC seems inexplicable.”

Susan Rice, official State Dept photo portrait, 2009.jpg

Susan Rice served as Obama’s White House National Security Advisor from 2013 to 2017. She was formerly U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Rice’s was mentioned as a possible replacement for retiring Secretary of State Hillary Clinton after President Barack Obama’s re-election in 2012. However, since Rice lied on five national television channels on December 13, 2012 on the Benghazi attack, Republicans in the Senate would have opposed her nomination.

Hansen wrote that after lying again, “Susan Rice now admits that she unmasked the names of private U.S. citizens swept up in Obama administration intelligence surveillance and seems to have no regrets about it.” “Samantha Power, the Obama administration’s former U.N. ambassador, does not deny that she, too, unmasked names—but strangely is reported to have argued that she was not responsible for all the unmaskings that appear under her authorizations on the transcripts,” said Hanson.

Samantha Power.jpg

Samantha Power She served as Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Multilateral Affairs and Human Rights on the National Security Council from January 2009 to February 2013. She was then appointed ambassador to the United Nations. Power was responsible for implementing Obama’s secret classified Presidential Directive 11 which stated that the Middle East was to be given to Iran and the North of Africa to al-Qaida and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Hansen stated the following: “If true, does that astonishing statement mean that Samantha Power has amnesia or that her own staff or others improperly used her name to access classified documents? Has anyone ever admitted to unmasking American citizens under surveillance, and then claimed that her authorizations were not as numerous as they appear in documents? And what were the connections between those who unmasked and those who illegally leaked information to the press?”

President Trump was ridiculed by the corrupt mainstream media when he tweeted that “Obama” (members of the Obama administration) had Trump’s “wires tapped” (electronically surveilled) in Trump Tower. He was correct. Donald Trump was spied upon by the NSA before he even ran for president, then during his campaign, the transition, and now as president as well. Sadly, we live in a surveillance society and this writer has also been a victim of being illegally spied upon and harassed by intelligence agencies due to his writings and publications.

Hansen pointed out that The Hill, not known as a conservative organ, “now is reporting that as early as 2009 some within Robert Mueller’s FBI knew of possible blackmail, bribery, and money-laundering by Russian interests in seeking, through various means, control of sizable uranium sources inside the United States—an agenda Putin’s surrogates apparently knew to be impossible without a waiver from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.”

Where the Real Collusion Lurked

Hansen explained that it was Hillary and Bill Clinton and Barack Obama who were the ones who colluded with Russia and not Donald Trump. He stated the following:

“Even as Mueller presses ahead and even as anti-Trump journalists have sought for a year to find any proof that Trump was a Russian patsy, the charge of collusion may be proved accurate after all—but it seems to have had little to do with Trump per se. Instead, Bill and Hillary Clinton, the former directly, the latter via the family foundation, may well have been empowering and profiting from Russian insiders who were eager to obtain control of 20 percent of North America’s uranium holdings. Indeed, Russian agents caught spying in connection with the deal were swapped out—in a not very favorable trade for the United States—without much audit. Stranger still, so far the denials have not contested the facts, but only the efficacy of the Russian-Clinton deal: there was supposedly not any wrongdoing given that so far the Russians have not shipped out any uranium as if a habitually drunk driver is not culpable until he kills someone on the road.”

“Barack Obama was strangely in no hurry to move on the opportunistic Russian collusion charges against Donald Trump during the campaign or between his election and inauguration—and perhaps not just because he knew there was no there there. Instead, Obama wisely may have concluded that if quid pro quo election-timed concessions to Russian interests constitute a criminal or treasonous offense, then his own hot-mic offer to the Putin government was a similar transgression. But more important, it seems likely now that Obama knew that any such reopening of the Russian question would not only expose a compromised Clinton in an election cycle but also his own administration—as knowledge of politically motivated decisions to ignore what might well have indictable offenses came to light.”

“At this point, it would be silly to ask why there will be no more $145 million gifts from Russian interests to the Clinton Foundation (or from anyone, for that matter), or no more $500,000 fees for a single Bill Clinton speech. Whereas the Clintons are always willing to sell something that properly belongs to the government, they are no longer in any position to negotiate anything and thus by their own financial standards have zero monetary value to the sorts who in the past were eager to buy them.”

“Are we finally nearing the end of our own Jacobin cycle of revolutionary fervor—as wild charges of criminality are exposed to be little more than the bitter feelings over a blown election or, worse, efforts either to nullify that election or an attempt to cloak the accusers’ own felonious behavior? But the inquisitions will likely stop only when the inquisitors, under intense pressures, learn that they have far more exposure to the very charges that they have leveled—and thus finally beg to call the whole sordid matter off.”

The lie about Russian collusion has sired truths beyond our wildest nightmares

Hansen concluded his illuminating article by saying the following:

“In a fair world, Robert Mueller would find that his original agenda had proved irrelevant, other than incidentally colliding with far more serious culpability on the part of many of those who had energized him. He would then either drop the investigation, recuse himself, or expand it to include far more likely charges of collusion that affected our national security.”

“In a fair world, those in the House Ethics Committee long ago would have dropped politically motivated and empty complaints against Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and would have agreed that he was simply a political target. He was preemptively targeted not for leaking classified government information (which he did not do), but for presciently long ago announcing to intelligence agencies and to the president that Obama Administration officials had likely improperly unmasked information about private U.S. citizens that was subsequently unlawfully leaked to the press—a tawdry process that ultimately may well be connected to many of the scandals mentioned above.”

“And in a fair world, those who were determined to indict all who profited from Russian largesse would conclude that the Clinton machine always should have been their most likely target. America is in a radical state of flux, or rather in a great accounting and recalibration, ranging from government to popular culture.”


Hillary Clinton violated multiple federal election laws. She committed serious crimes when she paid thugs to beat up Trump’s supporters at his rallies. The Clinton campaign paid for the anti-Trump unverified fake dossier and concealed the payment. The fake dossier was rapidly discredited after it was published. She also used agent provocateurs to demonize Donald Trump and his supporters. Clinton’s supporters appeared in the concealed video discussing voter fraud. The dossier was then shared with James Comey’s FBI and the Obama administration used it to illegally investigate members of the Trump campaign.

Now, however, Congress is investigating the role of Obama and Hillary Clinton in meddling with the Trump campaign. It is also investigating the bribes paid by Russia to members of the Obama administration and especially to the Clinton Foundation in approving the sale of 20% of the uranium mines to Russia, a geopolitical enemy of America.

Hillary Clinton was also involved in having an unsecure server at home where she illegally received classified documents. Clinton and Obama engaged in treason, dereliction of duty, and criminal negligence in the Libyan civil war and later in the gunrunning of weapons from Libya to Turkey to Syria that ended in the hands of the Islamic State and the al Nusra Front in Syria.

James Comey, Robert Muller, Susan Rice, Samantha Power, Eric Clapper, John Brennan, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, and others in the Obama administration as well as Debbie Wasserman Schultz need to be investigated. The Clintons need to be investigated and indicted for all the many crimes and scandals. And former President Barack Obama also needs to be investigated and indicted as well.

Draining the D.C. Swamp will be very difficult for the president. However, if President Trump fails to drain the Swamp, the creatures living there may eat him alive!