Outrage as James Clapper, other Hunter Biden laptop skeptics suddenly speak out against media: ‘What a fraud’

It’s now an infamous headline among conservatives and a sore spot for Politico. But at the time, the Oct. 19, 2020, story by Natasha Bertrand had its intended bombshell effect with this headline: “Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say.”

Now former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper says Politico “deliberately distorted” the letter he and more than 50 others – many of them open Joe Biden supporters – signed. Critics are wondering why the players in the story are speaking out more than two years later – just as House Republicans are investigating the matter – and why they didn’t cry foul at their own words being twisted at the time.

“If James Clapper knew Politico and Natasha Bertrand were lying about what their letter said, why didn’t he say so then?” journalist Glenn Greenwald asked on Monday. “Reality: the CIA/IC people lying wanted the media to spread this. Only now that someone has to take the hit is Clapper saying Politico lied.”

Clapper’s remarks showed up in a lengthy fact-check by the Washington Post’s Glenn Kessler on Monday, which broke down the letter itself and how it was also falsely characterized by then-candidate Joe Biden in the closing weeks of the 2020 election. Biden claimed at a debate with then-President Trump that intelligence officials had declared the laptop reported on by the New York Post was a “Russian plan.” Another letter signer, former deputy director of National Intelligence for analysis Thomas Fingar, told Kessler that no one should be “surprised” by the media or politicians that “willfully or unintentionally” misconstrue statements.  

JAMES CLAPPER ACCUSES POLITICO OF ‘DELIBERATELY’ DISTORTING LETTER ON BIDEN LAPTOP BEING RUSSIAN DISINFO

Kessler noted Politico’s headline did not accurately reflect the letter’s contents, which were not quite as conclusive, but rather suggested the laptop had the “earmarks” of a Kremlin disinformation operation. They also declared their “view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue” in some capacity. The laptop contained details about Hunter Biden’s overseas business dealings, including an email suggesting he peddled his father’s powerful position to help his interests, as well as salacious material involving sex and drugs.

The signers also stipulated they had no evidence to prove their claims but were mostly going by their gut. For a media that often regurgitated Russiagate storylines from intelligence community sources throughout the Trump administration – and was wary of helping Trump by pushing out material harmful to the Biden candidacy in a manner similar to the 2016 election – that was more than enough. 

Donald Trump and Joe Biden during the second and final presidential debate on Oct. 22, 2020, at Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

But despite Politico and Biden’s framing, the signers of the letter didn’t come out of the woodworks at the time to dispute their characterization of their words. Nor did they seem to care that numerous Democrats, including future Biden officials like Jen Psaki, Susan Rice, Kate Bedingfield, Andrew Bates and others, shared the story on Twitter or touted its contents in interviews.

The Washington Examiner’s Jerry Dunleavy ruefully noted Clapper claimed not to know Biden – his chosen candidate for president that year – had cited his own letter at a presidential debate.

RATCLIFFE: HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP WAS A PARTISAN DOMESTIC ‘DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN’

New York Post columnist Miranda Devine told Fox News Digital that Clapper’s comments “show what a fraud he is, and that he’s worried now the GOP controls the House and has vowed to haul in the signatories and make them testify under oath. He’s trying to pre-shape the narrative.”

Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, sent a letter earlier this month to a dozen of the signatories, including Clapper, demanding answers. Devine said she didn’t recall any of them expressing public discontent with Politico’s framing of their statements in 2020.

“They were silent. That was the message they wished to convey, and now they are scrambling because the GOP House is about to hold them accountable,” Devine said.

Clapper admitted again to Kessler that he and his fellow signers had “no evidence” to support their suspicions.

“To me, it’s a difference without a distinction. It could have been bad information, false information,” he said. “But we had no evidence, no inside baseball that it was. The intent of the letter was that this could be Russian disinformation — emphasis on could.”

Former CIA Director John Brennan, center, and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, right, arrive at a closed hearing before the Senate (Select) Intelligence Committee on May 16, 2018, on Capitol Hill. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

But Clapper sounded more sure in an interview with CNN’s Erin Burnett on Oct. 16, 2020, the same week the New York Post released their story that was promptly blocked by Big Tech outfits.

“To me, this is just classic textbook Soviet Russian tradecraft at work,” he said at the time. “The Russians have analyzed the target, they understand that the president and his enablers crave dirt on Vice President Biden. Whether it’s real or contrived, that doesn’t matter to them, and so all of a sudden, two-and-a-half weeks before the election, this laptop appears somehow, and emails on it without any metadata. It’s all very curious.”

JIM JORDAN ON HUNTER LAPTOP STORY: THE ONLY THING FAKE 18 MONTHS AGO WAS THE NEWS

Greenwald, a fervent critic of Russiagate coverage, lit into the media for transforming the letter into “fact.”  

“The CIA and other intelligence operative scumbags have a point here, one I’ve stressed from the start,” he tweeted on Monday. “In their letter to manipulate the election, they said they didn’t *know* it was Russian disinformation, just thought it was. It was the media that transformed it into fact.”

“I don’t care who is bored by it: 2 weeks before Americans went to vote for President, the CIA and others in the intelligence community concocted an outright lie that most major media corporations spread. Everyone now knows it’s a lie, but not one media outlet has retracted it,” he added.

The letter also included a feedback logic loop; the fact that the Washington Post had reported Rudy Giuliani could be the target of a Russian intelligence operation was significant to them because it mirrored their own concerns about Russia. The Washington Post story in question cited four anonymous sources.

Hunter Biden’s laptop was at the center of a Big Tech censorship campaign in 2020. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)

Politico noted that “several” of the signees of the letter were backing Biden; Fox News Digital counted at least 13 who had publicly endorsed Biden, including Clapper, ex-CIA Directors John Brennan, Leon Panetta and Michael Hayden, and former CIA officials Patty Brandmaier, Larry Pfeiffer, Paul Kolbe, Timothy Kilbourn, and John Sipher. Jeremy Bash, an MSNBC analyst who worked at the CIA and Pentagon under President Obama, also signed the letter.

Hayden, Panetta, Bash, Brennan and former CIA Director Mike Morell, who the Washington Post reported organized the letter in the first place, didn’t respond to requests for comment. Most of them ignored similar questioning by the New York Post last year.

CABLE NEWS PUNDITS INSIST GOP INVESTIGATORS PURSUING ‘WITCH HUNT’ FOR HUNTER BIDEN: ‘CONSPIRACY OF DUNCES’

Republican lawyer Kash Patel, who was the primary author of the 2018 memo from then-House intelligence committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., about significant flaws in the Russia investigation, believes the officials involved have a duty to explain themselves.

“One, this Congress should subpoena at least the leadership structure of those 51 people, those that served as directors and deputy directors of our intelligence agencies and law enforcement community and just say, ‘Why did you make this statement? Why did you sign this letter? What was the bait? You are the direct former director of the CIA. Certainly someone sent you intelligence for you to sign on to this and what was the intelligence,’” Patel told Fox News Digital.

Patel said revoking security clearances is something the executive branch can do, and a lot of the signees aren’t working in government service anymore but could eventually return. In the meantime, they use their clearance to continue pad their wallets.

The letter unsurprisingly made it onto CNN and MSNBC as well. 

The day after the Politico story published, left-wing CNN political analyst John Avlon praised the officials for speaking out and lambasted then-Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe for rejecting the Russian narrative.

Avlon was prompted by CNN anchor Laura Jarrett, the daughter of former Obama White House adviser Valerie Jarrett. 

CNN analyst John Avlon gushed over the intelligence officials who guessed the Hunter Biden laptop story was Russian disinformation. (Lorenzo Bevilaqua/Walt Disney Television via Getty Images)

“People to a certain extent are exhausted about hearing about Russian disinformation, but this actually really matters,” Jarrett said.

FORMER TWITTER EXECS WHO CENSORED HUNTER BIDEN LAPTOP STORY FACE QUESTIONING FROM HOUSE GOP

“It matters big-time,” Avlon said. “What doesn’t matter is if people are tired of hearing about Russian disinformation efforts, because they’re happening in this election. We know that. It is critically important to have 50 former members of the intelligence community come forward. In fact, it parallels something I heard in an interview with a former national counterterrorism expert, saying it has all the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.”

Avlon, known for his liberal commentaries under the guise of fact-checking, then accused Ratcliffe of political hackery.

“Of course, this is in contrast to Trump’s DNI John Ratcliffe, who seemed to attest to its validity or say they had no sense it was hacked. But it really speaks to how much he has lost credibility and acted… in a very nakedly partisan, political way,” he said.

MSNBC’s Kasie Hunt – now at CNN herself – also discussed the letter in a segment for “Way Too Early,” although she noted the signers had put forward “no evidence” the New York Post report on Hunter Biden was “falsified.” She fretted at the idea of repeating the Post’s report that Hunter Biden had used his father’s position to advance his foreign business dealings, ad-libbing, “I’m not even sure we should outline that.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Bertrand didn’t respond to a request for comment. She now also works at CNN.

Politico also did not respond to a request for comment. 

Fox News’ Hanna Panreck contributed to this report.