House and Senate lawmakers will formally start trying to reconcile their mammoth defense policy bills on Thursday with a fight on President TrumpDonald John TrumpJimmy Carter: ‘I hope there’s an age limit’ on presidency White House fires DHS general counsel: report Trump to cap California trip with visit to the border MORE‘s border wall looming.
Members of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) conference committee are set to meet Thursday morning, marking the formal start to negotiations.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Senate voted 87-7 on Wednesday evening to go to conference with the House to work out the differences on their defense bills.
Sens. Kirsten GillibrandKirsten GillibrandDemocrats seize Senate floor to protest gun inaction: ‘Put up or shut up’ At debate, Warren and Buttigieg tap idealism of Obama, FDR Trump court pick sparks frustration for refusing to answer questions MORE (D-N.Y.), Kamala Harris
Kamala Devi HarrisKavanaugh impeachment push hits Capitol buzz saw Mark Mellman: The most important moment in history? Biden leads in new national poll, Warren close behind in second place MORE (D-Calif.), Ed Markey
Edward (Ed) John MarkeyGreta Thunberg scolds Congress on climate action: ‘I know you are trying but just not hard enough’ Obama meets with Greta Thunberg: ‘One of our planet’s greatest advocates’ Young insurgents aren’t rushing to Kennedy’s side in Markey fight MORE (D-Mass.), Jeff Merkley
Jeffrey (Jeff) Alan MerkleyOvernight Health Care: Juul’s lobbying efforts fall short as Trump moves to ban flavored e-cigarettes | Facebook removes fact check from anti-abortion video after criticism | Poll: Most Democrats want presidential candidate who would build on ObamaCare Overnight Energy: Democrats call for Ross to resign over report he threatened NOAA officials | Commerce denies report | Documents detail plan to decentralize BLM | Lawmakers demand answers on bee-killing pesticide Oregon Democrats push EPA to justify use of pesticide ‘highly toxic’ to bees MORE (D-Ore.), Rand Paul
Randal (Rand) Howard PaulRepublicans wary of US action on Iran EXCLUSIVE: Swing-state voters oppose ‘surprise’ medical bill legislation, Trump pollster warns Rand Paul: Almost every mass shooter ‘is sending off signals’ MORE (R-Ky.), Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Ann WarrenKavanaugh impeachment push hits Capitol buzz saw Mark Mellman: The most important moment in history? Katie Pavlich: The Democrats’ desperate do-overs MORE (D-Mass.) and Ron Wyden
Ronald (Ron) Lee WydenDemocrats press for action on election security Interior gains new watchdog On The Money: NY prosecutors subpoena eight years of Trump tax returns | Senators struggle to get spending bills off ground as shutdown looms | Progressive tax-the-rich push gains momentum | Trump faces dwindling leverage with China MORE (D-Ore.) voted no.
The House had already voted to start the conference committee. Though Thursday will mark the first formal meeting, staffers and key lawmakers have been talking behind the scenes for months.
Lawmakers face a looming fight over whether or not to green light an effort to replace the $3.6 billion in military construction funding that the administration shifted toward the border wall as part of Trump’s emergency declaration.
The Senate defense bill “back fills” the funding, while the House bill does not. Democrats are fuming over Trump’s decision to leapfrog Congress and shift the military funds toward the wall.
“The House already voted this down. Democrats, myself, Speaker Pelosi, Chairwoman Lowey, and Ranking Member Leahy, have been crystal clear: we are not going to bless the president stealing money from the military by backfilling it later. This would render the Congress toothless, and the appropriations process meaningless,” Senate Minority Leader Charles SchumerCharles (Chuck) Ellis SchumerSchumer, Pelosi push Trump to back universal background check bill Sinema says she would back Kennedy in race against Markey Democrats threaten to withhold defense votes over wall MORE (D-N.Y.) said on Wednesday.
Republicans made an 11th-hour effort to get it in the House bill before voting to go to conference but their “motion to instruct” negotiators to support backfilling the money failed largely along party lines.
Rep. Mac ThornberryWilliam (Mac) McClellan ThornberryHouse rejects GOP motion on replacing Pentagon funding used on border wall Republicans pour cold water on Trump’s term limit idea Wave of GOP retirements threatens 2020 comeback MORE (R-Texas), the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, argued the motion would “ensure that, as we continue to argue about border security and a whole variety of other issues, that our troops do not suffer as a result of that argument.”
Negotiators will also need to cut deals on other controversial issues including ending U.S. support for the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen and a provision in the House bill that would block military action against Iran.
