The top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee abruptly announced late Thursday that after more than 14 hours of debate the panel would recess and wait until Friday morning to vote on articles of impeachment against President TrumpDonald John TrumpThe Hill’s Morning Report – Sponsored by AdvaMed – House panel expected to approve impeachment articles Thursday Democrats worried by Jeremy Corbyn’s UK rise amid anti-Semitism Warren, Buttigieg duke it out in sprint to 2020 MORE.
Judiciary Chairman Jerrold NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis NadlerHouse passes bill that would give legal status to thousands of undocumented farmworkers Collins accusing Democrats of ‘tearing down a world leader’ GOP calls for minority hearing on impeachment, threatens procedural measures MORE (D-N.Y.) recessed the impeachment articles markup after 11 p.m., saying that the committee would reconvene to cast the impeachment votes Friday at 10 a.m.
With Nadler’s announcement came an audible gasp from both the audience and the Republicans on the dais, who said they had received no warning and were under the impression that Thursday’s marathon hearing would conclude with votes on both articles before midnight, allowing members to start heading home for the weekend.
The outraged Republicans wasted no time blasting Nadler for what they saw as a procedural cheap-shot — one designed solely to allow Democrats more time before the TV cameras on Friday.
“You chose not to consult the ranking member,” Rep. Doug CollinsDouglas (Doug) Allen CollinsThe Hill’s Morning Report – Sponsored by AdvaMed – House panel expected to approve impeachment articles Thursday Parties clash as impeachment articles move closer to House vote House passes bill that would give legal status to thousands of undocumented farmworkers MORE (R-Ga.) said, looking at Nadler stunned.
Collins, then stepping off the dais in a huff, described the chairman’s move as a sign that trust between him and Nadler has broken down.
“That was the most egregious violation of trust between a committee chairman and ranking member I think I’ve ever seen,” said Collins, adding that “there was no discussion” about the change of plans.
“We thought we were going to do votes tonight,” he said.
“And then to do that right there shows that Chairman Nadler is zero, his staff is zero,” Collins said, calling the impeachment markups a “Kangaroo court.”
Collins then rushed outside the hearing room to a bank of TV cameras to air his frustrations further.
“The chairman’s integrity is gone,” he said, charging that the committee majority is “more concerned with being on TV in the morning than it was in finishing its job tonight and letting the members go home.”
His protests were echoed by other Republicans.
“Unbelievable,” Rep. Mike JohnsonJames (Mike) Michael JohnsonOvernight Defense: Bombshell report reveals officials misled public over progress in Afghanistan | Amazon accuses Trump of ‘improper pressure’ in Pentagon contract decision | House Judiciary holds final impeachment hearing Judiciary hearing gets heated as Democratic counsel interrogates GOP staffer Judiciary fireworks: GOP accuses Democratic counsel of impugning Trump’s motives MORE (R-La.) stated repeatedly on the dais.
Rep. Steve ChabotSteven (Steve) Joseph ChabotParties clash as impeachment articles move closer to House vote SECURE it — for small businesses and their workers Bottom Line MORE, a 12-term Ohio Republican, piled on.
“I have never seen anything like that,” he said to a Republican staffer on the dais.
Even rank-and-file Democrats on the committee were not told ahead of time that Nadler would postpone the votes, although they quickly defended the decision, citing the need for greater transparency.
“We weren’t sure if they had more amendments, they wouldn’t tell us that,” said Rep. Madeleine DeanMadeleine DeanImpeachment inquiry enters critical new phase Democrat unveils bill requiring banks to identify suspicious activity related to guns Democratic lawmakers call on Judiciary Committee to advance ‘revenge porn’ law MORE (D-Pa.). “And what the chairman’s spirit was: we want to make sure we do this in the light of day. We don’t want to vote on such an important article, or articles, that matter to the American people [and] to this president, in the late of night.”
The move came after Republicans introduced one amendment after another in an effort to protest the articles of impeachment, dragging out the hearing 14 hours as Democrats voted down their efforts to scrub the two articles of impeachment they are seeking to pass, which charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of justice.
A Democratic aide, when asked for the reasoning of the sudden move, said they felt Republicans were trying to run out the clock so that the vote would happen with the least eyes on them.
“We felt like they wanted us to pass this in the middle of the night, so we felt the American people deserved to see this historic vote. And it should be passed in the daylight and not in the middle of the night,” the aide said.
The two impeachment articles both stem from Trump’s handling of foreign policy in Kyiv, where the president and his allies had pressed Ukrainian leaders to launch two investigations the might have boosted Trump’s reelection bid next year.
The first article accuses Trump of abusing his office by withholding U.S. military aid to Ukraine amid his investigation requests; the second charges him with obstructing Congress throughout the Democrats’ investigation of the Ukraine affair.
Thursday’s postponement is not expected to alter the outcome of the debate: Judiciary Democrats are set to pass the two articles on Friday, sending them to the full House, where votes are likely to take place next Wednesday.
Still, some Republicans say this will impact their relationship with Democrats beyond impeachment.
“Hard to convey how upset everyone is,” said one Republican Judiciary aide, adding that “people had flights booked.”
