A U.S. C-17 sits at the Nevatim Air Base in the desert in Israel on Oct. 13, 2src23. The aircraft arrived Friday with crates of American munitions for Israel. | Lolita Baldor/AP
A State Department official involved with transferring arms to key American allies resigned from his post on Wednesday, saying that “shortsighted decisions” by the Biden administration contributed to his having to make an unbearable moral compromise.
“In my 11 years I have made more moral compromises than I can recall, each heavily, but each with my promise to myself in mind, and intact,” the official, Josh Paul, wrote in a post explaining his decision. “I am leaving today because I believe that in our current course with regards to the continued — indeed, expanded and expedited — provision of lethal arms to Israel — I have reached the end of that bargain.”
“I cannot work in support of a set of major policy decisions, including rushing more arms to one side of the conflict, that I believe to be shortsighted, destructive, unjust, and contradictory to the very values that we publicly espouse,” he added.
Paul worked for State’s Bureau of Political-Military Affairs, according to his statement and his LinkedIn profile. The office manages defense relationships with U.S. allies and oversees the transfers of weapons and arms. The Huffington Post reported the news earlier on Wednesday.
His decision comes as the Biden administration has been surging weapons and munitions to Israel, a longtime key ally in the Middle East, following the Palestinian militant group Hamas’ surprise attack against the country earlier this month. But the war has also been accompanied by emotional and sometimes vitriolic responses from a divided public regarding America’s allyship with Israel through the longstanding conflict in the region — division expressed in events ranging from high-profile public protests to outbursts on college campuses.
President Joe Biden, whose Democratic Party has increasingly expressed sympathy for the Palestinian people, has been threading a needle over the situation. While showing a whole-of-government support to the United States’ longtime friend, he has also sought to express concern that Israel act humanely toward the Gaza Strip — a territory where it has indicated it will soon begin a ground invasion.
“This Administration’s response — and much of Congress’ as well — is an impulsive reaction built on confirmation bias, political convenience, intellectual bankruptcy, and bureaucratic inertia,” Paul wrote in his statement. “That is to say, it is immensely disappointing, and entirely unsurprising.”
In a statement to POLITICO, Paul outlined several actions that he believes the Biden administration and Congress could take to better address the ongoing crisis, including recognition of a Palestinian state as the start of a diplomatic process, rather than an eventual goal, and better recognition of human rights risks in arms transfers.
The U.S. should not provide “arms into a conflict where there is a blatant risk — supported by a lengthy historical record — of likely and disproportionate civilian harm,” he wrote.
During a trip to Israel on Wednesday, Biden announced $1srcsrc million in humanitarian aid to Gaza and the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
The State Department declined to comment.
This post originally appeared on and written by:
By Andrew Zhang
Politico
